Report and Financial Statements 2024 | 39
Strategic Report
Strategic Report Governance Report Financial Report Notice of Meeting
Other Information
Chairman’s StatementOverview Auditor’s Report
and viability were those relating to inappropriate business strategy, potential investment
portfolio under-performance and its effect on the Company’s share price discount/
premium and dividends, as well as threats to security over the Company’s assets. Our
risk evaluation forms an inherent part of our strategy determination described on
page 35.
Through a series of stress tests ranging from moderate to extreme scenarios, including
the impact of market shocks and based on historical information, but forward looking over
the five years commencing 1 May 2024, the Board assessed the risks of:
• Sustained high levels of inflation.
• Potential illiquidity of the Company’s portfolio.
• Substantial falls in investment values on the ability to meet loan covenant requirements
and to repay and re-negotiate funding.
• Significant falls in income on the ability to continue paying steadily-rising dividends and
maintaining adequate revenue reserves.
The Board also took into consideration the operational robustness of its principal service
providers and the effectiveness of business continuity plans in place, potential effects of
regulatory changes and the potential threat from competition. The Board’s conclusions are
set out under ‘Long-Term Viability: Five Year Horizon’.
Based on its assessment and
evaluation of the Company’s future
prospects, the Board has a reasonable
expectation that the Company will be
able to continue in operation and meet
its liabilities as they fall due over the
coming five years. This period has
been chosen because it is consistent
with the advice provided by many
investment advisers, that investors
should invest in equities for a minimum
of five years. The Company’s business
model, strategy and the embedded
characteristics listed below have helped
define and maintain the stability of
the Company over many decades. The
Board expects this to continue and
will continue to assess viability over
subsequent five year rolling periods.
• The Company has a long-term
investment strategy under which it
invests mainly in readily realisable,
publicly listed securities and which
restricts the level of borrowings.
• The Company’s business model
and strategy are not time limited
and, as a global investment trust
company, are unlikely to be adversely
impacted as a direct result of political
uncertainties.
• The Company is inherently structured
for long-term outperformance, rather
than short-term opportunities, with
five years considered as a sensible
time-frame for measuring and
assessing long-term investment
performance.
• The Company is able to take
advantage of its closed-end
investment trust structure, such
as having borrowing arrangements
in place and the ability to secure
additional finance in excess of five
years.
• There is rigid monitoring of the
headroom under the Company’s bank
borrowing financial covenants.
• Regular and robust review of
revenue and expenditure forecasts
is undertaken throughout the year
against a backdrop of large revenue
and capital reserves.
• The Company retains title to all
assets held by the Custodian which
are subject to further safeguards
imposed on the Depositary.
Long-Term Viability: Five Year Horizon
Principal Risks Mitigation by strategy Actions taken on Principal Risks in the year
Service providers and systems security – Errors, fraud or control
failures at service providers or loss of data through business
continuity failure or cyber attacks could damage reputation
or investors’ interests or result in loss. Cyber risks remain
heightened.
The ancillary functions of administration, company secretarial,
accounting and marketing services are all carried out by the
Manager. Custody and depositary services are provided by third
party suppliers.
The Board reviews and monitors the services provided and the
effectiveness of service providers’ processes through the review
of internal controls reports and internal efficiency KPIs.
The Audit and Management Engagement Committee and the Board have regularly reviewed
the Company’s risk management framework with the assistance of the Manager. Regular
control reports are provided by the Manager which cover risk, compliance and oversight of
its own third-party service providers, including IT security and cyber-threats. Reports from
the Depositary, which is liable for the loss of any of the Company’s securities and cash
held in custody unless resulting from an external event beyond its reasonable control,
were reviewed. The Board is satisfied that the continuity arrangements of all key suppliers
continued to work well and as such, this risk is unchanged.
Investment performance – Inappropriate business strategy or
policy, or ineffective implementation, could result in poor returns
for shareholders. Failure to access the targeted market or meet
investor needs or expectations, including Responsible Investment
and climate change in particular, leading to significant pressure
on the share price. Political risk factors could also impact
performance as could market shocks such as those experienced in
relation to Covid-19 and the war in Ukraine.
Under our Business Model, a manager is appointed with the
capability and resources to manage the Company’s assets, asset
allocation, gearing, stock and sector selection and risk. The
individual regional investment portfolios are managed to provide in
combination a well-diversified, lower volatility and lower risk overall
portfolio structure. The Board holds a separate strategy meeting
each year and considers investment policy review reports from the
Manager at each Board meeting.
The performance of the Company relative to its Benchmark,
its peers and inflation is a KPI measured by the Board on an
ongoing basis and is reported on page 40.
Columbia Threadneedle Investments has been retained as Manager and continues to
deliver on the Company’s objective. It operates within a responsible investment culture
under a corporate commitment to four key Sustainability Principles: Social Change,
Financial Resilience, Community Building and Environmental Impact. Through the Manager,
the Company has the flexibility to innovate, adapt and evolve as Responsible Investment
necessities and expectations change. Marketing and investor relations campaigns continued
throughout the year, including presentations by the Lead Manager to wealth managers,
private clients and institutions across the country. Detailed reports provided by the Lead
Manager have been reviewed by the Board at each of its meetings. Strong operational
performance from the investment portfolio over the year has resulted in the dividend for the
year increasing by 22.2%. In overall terms, this risk is considered unchanged.
Discount/premium – A significant share price discount or premium
to the Company’s NAV per share, or related volatility, could lead
to high levels of uncertainty or speculation and the potential to
reduce investor confidence. Increased uncertainty in markets due
to an event such as Covid-19 or the significant rise in inflation
could lead to falls and volatility in the Company’s NAV.
The Board has established share buy-back and share issue
policies, together with a dividend policy, which aim to moderate the
level and volatility of the share price discount or premium to the
NAV per share and it seeks shareholder approval each year for the
necessary powers to implement those policies.
The discount/premium to NAV at which the Company's shares
trade is a KPI measured by the Board on an ongoing basis and is
reported on page 40.
Despite actively buying in shares on a regular, ongoing basis in order to address the
imbalance between the supply and demand of the Company's shares, the discount has
remained wider than desired although it did fall during the period. During the course of the
year, the Manager has continued to increase marketing activity over a number of channels
and has enhanced the messaging around the core investment proposition. This activity
aims to stimulate demand for the Company’s shares from existing and new investors.
Given the continued higher prevailing discount level the risk is considered to have remained
heightened during the year.